Tuesday, May 14, 2013

From Concerned Burlington Neighbors: List of Bans & Moratoria in Otsego County and NYS

Bans and Moratoria


A moratorium stops development action until plans are finalized.  In the case of shale gas drilling (Hydraulic Fracturing), a moratorium puts all activities on hold until there are rules in place to govern the drilling.
A ban is a decision to prohibit an activity.

Home rule is the doctrine that localities use to control certain activities. New York is a home rule state and as many government functions as practical are given to the town, city, or village.
      

Municipalities with Bans in Otsego County:  

Cherry Valley
Middlefield
Milford
New Lisbon
City of Oneonta
Otsego
Plainfield
Roseboom
Springfield
           
Municipalities with Moratoria in Otsego County:

Butternuts
Oneonta
Otego

Municipalities with Bans in New York State:

Albany                                          Albany County
Guilderland
Summerland                                Cayuga County
Oxford (Village)                           Chenango County
Andes                                           Delaware County
Beacon                                         Dutchess County
Buffalo                                          Erie County
Wales
Brighton                                        Monroe County
Perinton
Niagara Falls                               Niagara County
Wilson
Augusta                                        Oneida County
Marshall
New Hartford
Rome
Camillus                                       Onondaga County
Marcellus
Onondaga
Otisco
Skaneateles
Spafford
Syracuse
City and Town of Geneva         Ontario County
Fulton                                           Oswego County
Bethel                                           Sullivan County
Forrestburgh
Highland
Lumberland
Tusten
Caroline                                       Tompkins County
Danby
Dryden
Ithaca
Trumansburg
Ulysses
Rochester                                    Ulster County
Wawarsing
Woodstock
Jerusalem                                    Yates County

Municipalities with Moratoria in New York State:

Berne                                            Albany County
Rensselaerville
Westerlo
Alfred                                             Allegany County
Yorkshire                                      Cattaraugus County
Genoa                                           Cayuga County
Ledyard
Locke
Moravia
Niles
Scipio
Sennett
Copake                                           Columbia County
Germantown
Cortlandville (expired)                  Cortland County
Sidney                                            Delaware County
Colden                                            Erie County
Oppenheim                                    Fulton County
Stafford                                           Genesee County
Little Falls                                       Herkimer County
Manheim
Newport
Avon                                                Livingston County
Caledonia
Conesus
Geneseo
Lima
Livonia
Mount Morris
Nunda
Portage
Sparta
Springwater
Brookfield                                        Madison County
Eaton
Lenox
Lincoln
Mendon                                            Monroe County
Penfield
City of Rochester
Rush
Minden                                             Montgomery County
St. Johnsville (Village & Town)
Annsville                                          Oneida County
Ava
Boonville
Camden
Clinton
Deerfield
Florence
Floyd
Forestport
Kirkland
Paris
Remsen
Sangerfield
Steuben
Trenton
Utica
Vernon
Verona
Vienna
Westmoreland
Whitestown
Dewitt                                                Onondaga County
Eldridge (expired)
Fabius
Lafayette
Otisco
Tully
Bristol                                                Ontario County
Canandagua (City & Town)
Gormham
Hopewell
Manchester
Naples (Village & Town)
Richmond
South Bristol
West Bloomfield
Bienheim                                          Schoharie County
Richmondville
Schoharie
Sharon
Sharon Springs
Wateloo                                            Seneca County
Wayne                                              Stuben County
Owego (Village)                              Tioga County
Enfield                                              Tompkins County
Lansing
Newfield
Olive                                                  Ulster County
Huron                                                Wayne County
Barrington                                         Yates County
Benton
Middlesex
Milo
Penn Yan
Starkey
Torrey

Sunday, May 5, 2013

The Ban Movement...According to Chip!

A Brief History of the Town Ban Movement in New York

History is written by the winners. So, with that in mind, here’s my take on how the town ban movement started in New York, in the word’s of the winners, those relatively few men and women that were instrumental in making it happen, both as a legal strategy and then as a realization – one town at a time.
The history of the Middlefield and Dryden lawsuits has already been written in legal journals, such as Charles Gottlieb’s piece, here. And in the findings of the courts themselves, as summarized in the appellate court’s ruling in Dryden.  What has not been adequately chronicled is how those town bans – that were so valiantly defended – came to be enacted in the first place. The conventional wisdom is that these town bans were a result of one or more of the following:
A. An amorphous “grass roots” effort of aging hippies seeking relevance in their Golden Years
B. Environmental NGOs, such as the Environmental Defense Fund
C. A secret cabal of The Park Foundation, Josh Fox, GazProm, and the Saudis
D. The Slottjes
E. None of the above
F. All of the above
Only D. applies – partially.
Almost every town ban came about through the singular initiative of a few local citizens. With precious little help from anyone outside their communities – with the notable exception of the Slottjes, plus a handful of circuit riding municipal attorneys, like Doug Zamelis, and some hard working land use planners – like Ted Fink - upon whose work good ordinances are based.
In most cases, only a handful of people made the effort to initiate these ban. And for some reason that I have never quite fathomed, they were, more often than not, women. Courageous women. Hard working women. Clever women. So here’s to them. 
The Idea
The threat of shale gas industrialization was clearly apparent in New York by 2008 – as evidenced by the de facto moratorium put in place by the state, in the absence of updated environmental guidelines (GEIS) to apply to HVHF wells. The initial town and county actions – expressions of concern and bans on drilling on county property, such as Sullivan Counting banning drilling on county lands on July 25, 2010, were largely ministerial, and in the case of the resolutions, without legal substance. But these initial actions helped spawn the town ban movement. At the time, to be charitable, the efforts of activists was a bit unfocused – test your water before you get fracked. Petition the DEC to behave. Pushing ropes. To be uncharitable, there were a lot of headless chickens running around at the time. From that chaos emerged the leaders of the town bans.
The first widely circulated paper online that addressed how a town could use its land use ordinances (zoning) to prohibit shale gas industrialization was published by Todd Mathes in March 2009 when he was a municipal attorney at Whiteman Osterman and Hanna, an Albany law firm. Simply put, Mathes’s interpretation of the relevant statute and case law was that a properly enacted land use law, based on a comprehensive land use ordinance, could be applied to oil and gas drilling, as an heavy industrial use, because state law did not specifically pre-empt land use ordinances from addressing such activities. As Mathes put it succinctly :
A plain-meaning interpretation . . . may support the argument that New York municipalities may regulate the industry outside of the scope of the State’s regulatory program.
Meaning towns could limit the activity under their zoning laws, they just could not regulate the activity itself within the town. This is how land use applies to gas wells in most other states – by zoning – within the town. (See comment on the Town of Virgil below)
In January 2010, Michael Kenneally of the New York Association of Towns (NYAOT) published a paper with Mathes that referred to the issue from a Home Rule perspective – the right of a town to control land uses within its borders.  The Association of Towns were later to write a key amicus in the Dryden case.

Attorneys Helen and David Slottje took this a step further and explained why land use laws could be used to prohibit shale gas industrialization completely – effectively banning it from a town. Since, as they explained, state law addressed the regulation of how wells were drilled. But if that activity was banned in a town under a lawfully enacted zoning law, the activity would not exist in the town. How the activity was regulated by the state would be moot within the town. So, arguably, Helen and David Slottje were the first attorneys to widely popularize the notion that a town could “ban fracking” To that end, she presented a Power Point at the first statewide conference on Home Rule at the Otesaga Hotel in Cooperstown, on April 9th, 2011.  
Also presenting at the Otesaga conference was land planner Nan Stolzenburg, who was already working with several early adopters of town bans, namely Middlefield and Springfield, to update their town land use plans. The key role of the land planner is often overlooked in these town bans. Absent a good land use plan, a town land use ordinance coud be indefensible. Ironically, in picking the Town of Middlefield to challenge, the gas lobby picked the worst foe imaginable since Ms. Stolzenburg had just finished its land use plan, and the town’s legal counsel had recently updated the land use ordinance - with legal opinions on how zoning could be applied to gas wells.
Michelle Kennedy, a Cooperstown attorney, gave her reasoning on how shale gas industrialization was not immune to land use ordinances – in a paper that was later published by the Fordham Law Review. And a civil engineer from Laberge outlined how road use ordinances could be use to address shale gas impacts.
The Otesaga forum also explained how to organize a ban initiative: Julie Huntsman, who organized the Town of Otsego, and Peg Leon, who helped organize the Town of Middlefield, explained how to petition local residents and mobilize opposition to fracking.
The ubiquitous Cris McConkey was there to film the Otesaga Home Rule Forum, here.
Shortly after the Otesaga Home Rule Forum, Otsego County towns adopted bans in quick succession:  Town of Otsego, 5/13/11, Middlefield 5/13/11, Springfield 6/20/11 and Cherry Valley, 7/16/11.
One Woman Takes the Initiative to Enact the First Town Ban
Success may have many parents, and failure may be an orphan, but in the case of the first town ban ordinance, there was really just one parent: Julie Huntsman. Since, absent her initiative and resourcefulness, the Town of Otsego would probably not have been the first town to ban. And like its immediate neighboring towns, such as the Towns of Hartwick, Exeter, and Richfield Springs – none of which have adopted bans - it might not have any ban at all – without the initiative of key people.
After the legal papers had been published and the Power Point presentations had been made, virtually every town in Upstate New York had access to the same information that the Town of Otsego had. What separates the ban towns – each one of them – was the initiative of a few locals. That is the key to the story. It takes a Julie to have a ban. 
What Mrs. Huntsman did was organize.  She is a vet by training – not a politician nor a lawyer nor a environmental activists. Nor, for that matter, a blogger.  She organized presentations in the town, where Lou Allstadt, Ron Bishop, and Michelle Kennedy spoke. Oh, and some token Texan, whose name escapes me, spoke at Templeton Hall, Cooperstown, on September 7th, 2010. Then, in Julie’s own words, she got to work building political support for a ban:
In mid February, 2011 the Town Supervisor announced that the TB was hosting a special town hall meeting on gas drilling March 4 so that the community could be heard, and it was properly advertised.  She encouraged the few pro’s that she knew to get their people there so there would be no justified  excuses from them.   That meeting was the motivation for the phone survey, because I knew we needed something that would leave absolutely no doubt in those board members minds that Town of Otsego did not want this mess.  Had to put it together fast.  Asked some of the previous name gatherers to help and recruited new people too.  Called up Simon Thorpe of Ommegang and he committed five or six staff members to help.  Gave everybody the script and they had like 8 days to do it.
So in 8 or 9 days every registered  in the town of Otsego voter got called.  A lot were out of town for winter break, lots of wrong numbers, but 1159 people were actually spoken to.  945 (81.5%) concerned/opposed  (almost every volunteer poller said nearly all their respondents indicated adamant opposition).  Off the top of my head I don’t recall the “drill baby drill ” number, but it amounted to 4.5%; 14% undecided or refused to give a response.  So at that March 4 special meeting I was able to deliver those results to the town board.  In the mean time petition cards (previously mailed) with comments were still coming in…that effort ultimately netted another 700 names, for 1400 total.
Got pushback from a lone pro-fracker on the planning board during the town’s April meeting, saying the pro-drilling side had not been heard.  The Town Super (Meg Kiernan) reminded him of the March meeting and the fact the town board had not had an “anti-drilling” presentation ever; that (the opposition) came forth during public comment period, and independent community groups were free to organize their own meeting, which the anti-frackers (JH) had done.  Ended up inviting him and one other pro guy to speak to the town’s Natural Gas Advisory Committee when they met in May.  When I got wind of that I told the committee chair, Atwell, that Kelly (Branigan) and I were on the County NGAC and would have just returned from the county’s PA trip April 27; we would like to offer our perspectives then, as well.  She agreed.
So Kelly (Branigan) and I spoke to the town’s Natural Gas Advisory Committee, turned in the results of the surveys and petitions and on May 11, 2011 the amendment passed.
The Town of Otsego’s “ban” was an amendment to their land use law drafted in large part by a retired state judge, Lang Keith, who later became a town alderman.
Other Early Banners 
Local heroes were at work in Middlefield (5/13/11) where Sarah White, Peg Leon, Kelly Branigan and others lead the petition drive for a ban. In Springfield (6/20/11) where Harry Levine was the man that pulled the plow. Here’s Harry’s characteristically self-effacing account:
The Springfield local law was adopted at the initiative of our Town Board and its Supervisor, Bill Elsey.  He was looking at the action being taken by Cherry Valley and wanted to adopt a similar ban.  But without zoning, the town took a different approach based upon its police powers.
Advocates for Springfield sent out a community survey in February 2011 (see attached) and got overwhelming results (also attached). We followed with a letter writing campaign.
(Note: I wrote the Town of Otsego’s petition by simply re-wording Harry’s survey. JLN)
The town board introduced a local law  that Michelle Kennedy crafted.  The law was officially adopted June 2011.
The town had already adopted a good comprehensive plan (Nan Stolzenburg) that served as the foundation for the local law.  David Staley deserves a lot of credit for the plan.  He was a former chair of the Springfield Planning Board.
There are some late bloomers on Karen’s List, here’s Allegra Schecter’s story:
It was Michelle Kennedy who inspired me, on a cold night in January 2011. I heard her speak in Cooperstown, with Adrian and Nicole, about the “possibility“ of banning fracking in Towns, through Home Rule based on the Frew Run gravel decision. I was so impressed that I went home and wrote a petition to ban fracking in my Town of Roseboom. I contacted her about it, and then went door to door all that Winter, eventually gathering over 300 signatures. I presented them to the Town Board – who knew nothing- and wanted to do nothing about it. So I founded ROAR (Roseboom Owners Awareness Response) Against Fracking and we raised enough money to finally convince our Town Board to allow Michelle to help us.
First, Michelle drew up moratorium for us, which we put on the shelf, to use “just in case”. She then helped us complete our Comprehensive Plan, that would support “The Protection of the Rural Environment Local Law of the Town of Roseboom”, which was finally passed (despite some Town Board opposition) in December 2012! 
After doing 32 shale shows around the state, it has been my experience that this is almost always the  it  works: Many are called to the cause, but few do the workSo here’s to those few, those happy few, where the rubber hits the road. Take a bow. Home Rule Honor Roll (a work in progress) : 
Helen & David Slottje, Todd Mathes, Mike Kenneally, Mary Jo Long,  Michelle Kennedy, Nan Stolzenburg, John Lyons, Doug Zamelis, Hilary Lambert, Marie McCrae, Bruce Ferguson, Colleen Blaylock, James Herman, Judge Lang Keith, Julie Huntsman, Kelly Branigan, Peg Leon, Sarah White, Harry Levine, Bill Elsey, Meg Kiernan, Anne Marie Garti, Nicole Dillingham, Adrian Kuzminski, Lou Alstadt, Dr. Ron Bishop, Dr Chris Kohlje, Ellen Pope, Mary Menapace, Sarah Hess, Martha Robertson, Linda Lavine, Sheila Cohen, Mayor Ryan,  Allegra Schecter, Isaac Silberman Gorn, William Huston, James Dean, Anne Keith, Barbara Pope, Ian Urbina, Deborah Rogers, Jannette Barth, Krys Cail, Michael Dineen, Mike Bosetti, Barb Monroe, Cris McConkey, Bonnie Reynolds, Toshia Hance, the Mum Farm, MumuMuesli, Larry Bennett, Simon Thorpe, The Josh, The Sandra, Dr Anthony Ingraffea, Dr. Robert Howarth, Deborah Goldberg, Kate Sinding, Roger Downs, Teresa Winchester, Mary Beilby, Stuart Anderson, Albert Crudo, Irving Hall, Richard Lacey, The Yoko, Dominic Calsolaro, Sue Rapp, Peter Hudiburg, Kim Felter, Phillip Simpson, Sandy Podulka, Stan Scobie,Carol Marner, Karen Edelstein, Jack Ossont, Joe Hoff, Michelle Bamberger, Dominic Frongillo, Irene Weiser, Annette Gurdo, Texas Sharon, Mayor Tillman, Theo Colburn, Larysa Dyrszka, Julia Walsh, John Armstrong, Chip Northrup, Dory Hippauf, Jill Weiner, C.A. Lawrence, Maura Stephens, Vera Scoggins, Matt Damon, Mark Ruffalo, Kathy Shimberg, Clarke Rhoades, Maureen Dill, Jim Kevlin, Senator James Seward, Thomas Jefferson, Stephen Colbert, the list goes on and on . . .
And the only “aging hippie” on it that is a covert agent for GazProm the Saudis is me. 
Get your town on the list. What the frack are you waiting for ?

Friday, May 3, 2013

"HOME RULE" RULES!

Middlefield Road
Middlefield, NY

"Home Rule" Rules! 
NY Appellate Court Upholds Towns' Powers to Regulate Land Use
  
Today the New York Appellate Court issued its ruling in the Anschutz v. Dryden and Cooperstown Holstein v. Middlefield cases, and in both instances upheld the constitutional right of towns to determine what land use activities are best for their communities. 
  
The decision, which you can read here and on Otsego 2000's website, is a unanimous and unequivocal decision; the Towns won on all points. This decision upholds the power of local town boards which have already acted to protect their communities with a ban against fracking and gives courage to those that are still considering such steps. The Appellate Division found that there was neither express preemption nor implied preemption of local zoning powers. Notably, the Court discussed the industry's argument that statutory provisions fostering energy development and prohibiting "waste" required a finding of preemption. The Court stated there was no support of this interpretation:

 "...this does not equate to an intention to require oil and gas drilling operations to occur in each and every location where such resource is present, regardless of the land uses existing in that locale. Indeed, the policy of the OGSML explicitly seeks to protect the rights of "all persons including landowners and the general public" - not just the owners of oil and gas properties, such as petitioner ..., a goal which is realized when individual municipalities can determine whether drilling activities are appropriate for their respective communities." (Decision, p. 15.)

We all owe an enormous debt of gratitude to the Town Boards of Middlefield and Dryden for having the courage to take the necessary steps to defend their right to protect their communities, as well as to the citizens, Middlefield Neighbors, Dryden Resources Awareness Coalition, Brewery Ommegang and other businesses, and the many other activist groups who supported these towns in the face of sometimes intense pressure from this industry. Next, we must thank the excellent lawyers in our community who contributed their skills because this cause is right. We thank Michelle Kennedy, Douglas Zamelis, Helen and David Slottje, Mary Ann Long, Deborah Goldberg of Earthjustice, Kate Sinding of NRDC, Whiteman, Osterman & Hanna, and the firms that prepared the many amicus briefs.  

We are indeed fortunate to have such a strong community committed to protecting our region's singularly beautiful resources.

O2K Logo


PO Box 1130, Cooperstown, NY 13326

Otsego 2000 is a not-for-profit organization founded
in 1981 to protect the environmental, scenic, cultural
and historic resources of the Otsego Lake region
and northern Otsego County

Like us on Facebook

Monday, April 8, 2013

Village of Morris Joins National Historic Site Register

April 6, 2013

Village of Morris joins national historic site register

The village of Morris has joined both the New York and National Register of Historic Places, giving residents the opportunity to take advantage of generous tax credits when they make improvements to their property.
“Having this designation is really an expression of the pride we have in our community,” said Stacia Norman of the Morris Historical Society.
The initial bid to have the village be nominated for the National Register began in 1980, but enthusiasm waned after a couple of years, she said.
Those seeking the designation renewed the effort several years ago and hired a consultant, Jessie Ravage of Cooperstown, to guide the group and develop the nomination that was officially approved by the National Register in late February.
The earliest settlers of the village of Morris were French immigrants fleeing the Reign of Terror following the French Revolution. What drew them to the hamlet was water — specifically Butternut Creek, which was ripe for industrial applications, such as mills.
The initial settlers called the place Louisville, but as the village fell more and more under the influence of settlers with English backgrounds, it became known as Morris. The village, which has structures that date as far back as 1790, was established officially in 1870. Today, it has a population of just fewer than 600 people.
The historic district, according to the National Register, encompasses not only the properties within the village boundaries but also several properties partially or just outside the village. These include the Hillington Cemetery, a Quaker cemetery associated with the early settlement, and the Otsego County fairground, which straddles the village’s boundary.
“Morris was a great industrial hamlet in the 19th century,” Norman said. “We’re at a crossroads, and a lot of traffic went through Morris. The were all sorts of woolen factories and cotton factories, and there was a cheese factory. Many of these stone buildings that were here then are intact.”
It was this unusually large assemblage of stone buildings — with domestic, religious and commercial purposes — that helped propel the village’s nomination for inclusion on the National Register.
The National Register is the official list of the nation’s historic places deemed worthy of preservation. It was authorized by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and is the official listing of buildings, structures, districts, objects and sites that have been significant in the history, architecture, archaeology, engineering and culture of the state and the nation.
For personal reasons, Norman noted that she is thrilled to have the new designation because she will now qualify for tax credits by making upgrades to her own house in Morris.
“It’s another reason to be excited,” she said.
Ravage, the consultant, said getting the designation “opens up a lot of opportunities for tax credits for rehabilitation work on homes, and that credit has just been extended for another five years in the state of New York.”
In New York, the National Register program is administered by the state Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Places.
“I think many people whose families have been in Morris for generations certainly understand the village’s historical significance,” Norman said. “One of the things that draws people here in the first place is the small-village charge and the historic charm of the buildings.”

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

CEDC Calls on Gov. Cuomo to Demonstrate Leadership

CEDC calls on Governor Cuomo to Lead
In a full-page ad in the Albany's Legislative Gazette the grassroots organization Catskill Citizens for Safe Energy and the environmental law firm Community Environmental Defense Council (CEDC) call on Governor Andrew Cuomo to demonstrate leadership on hydraulic fracturing. The question of whether New York should permit high volume fracking has been debated for years, but the state still has not developed a coherent approach to the issue.
"Governor Cuomo has repeatedly promised us that 'science, not politics' will decide the fate of fracking, but where's the science?" asks Catskill Citizens' Kate Bowers.
"After two years in office, the governor still hasn't ordered an independent health impact assessment, something the medical community insists is vital if the state is to make an informed decision."
Economist Jannette Barth also signed onto the ad. She's been calling for an in depth, economic analysis of shale gas extraction for years. "The notion that fracking the Marcellus Shale will automatically benefit the state and local communities is simply not supported by the facts. One only has to look at the extreme poverty and endemic health problems in the coal mining regions of Appalachia to realize extractive industries can impoverish communities."
CEDC Attorneys Helen and David Slottje are concerned that the governor will not stand up to the gas industry and protect rural residents.
"The right of a community to control its own destiny is guaranteed by the New York State Constitution, but the governor has indicated he might try to overturn local laws if they get in the way of fracking" says David Slottje. (Last summer Governor Cuomo was quoted as saying "You could override local government, or you could say, 'Well we're going to respect home rule if it coincides with the obvious and necessary ramp up period anyway.'")
Over the last three years CEDC has helped scores of municipalities enact moratoria and zoning ordinances that prohibit fracking.
Another signatory, author and Riverkeeper founder Robert H. Boyle, has been at the forefront of environmental battles in New York for decades.  He says the governor's failure to reform the DEC's Division of Mineral Resources is a troubling sign.  "It's well known that Mineral Resources is a captive agency that's been doing the bidding of industry lobbyists for years. If Governor Cuomo cannot, or will not, put his own house in order, then he cannot be trusted to protect New York State."

CEDC is a nonprofit, public interest law firm. We largely rely on the generous donations of individuals to enable our work to protect our environment, promote democracy and justice, and advocate for sustainable development.

Friday, February 22, 2013

AMERICANS AGAINST FRACKING

Dear Friends:

I am writing to thank you for your support in stopping fracking in New York and also alert you to an urgent situation at the federal level that we are moving on. This email is only received by organizational leaders, and it's crucial that you take action and share this with your networks.  

First, the great news from New York, where the Commissioner from the Department of Health just put the brakes on fracking, saying that, "...the impacts on the public health are properly considered before a state permits drilling."  Our thanks to Governor Cuomo and Dr. Shah for listening to the concerns of countless scientists and health professionals, not to mention the will of the people.  This campaign is far from over and New Yorkers Against Fracking will continue to keep the pressure on, but this is a major development. This success came right on the heals of our running an ad in the Des Moines Register signed onto by over 100 of your organizations, which called on Governor Cuomo to proceed with, "NOT ONE WELL." The ad was covered in Politico, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and elsewhere and sent a strong message that fracking is a major issue that national leaders must respond to our growing movement.

Americans Against Fracking, thank you!  

We now have another looming and urgent challenge on the horizon:  The Obama Administration is about to tap Ernest Moniz, a fracking cheeleader, as his Energy Secretary.  Moniz serves as director of MIT’s Energy Initiative, whose founding members include Shell, Saudi Aramco, ENI and BP Technology Ventures, Inc. He supports fracked natural gas as a “bridge fuel” and has testified to congress that the environmental problems associated with fracking are “challenging but manageable.” This appointment could come as early as later today.  

On Monday, while 50,000 people were marching in Washington DC opposing the Keystone pipeline, fracking, and climate change, the president was enjoying a day of golf with gas and oil executives at a private club in Florida.  If this is a sign of things to come, we're in big trouble.  

Take action - and share this in your networks!  We need to get the word out and send a strong message to President Obama that if he is serious about climate change, he should not appoint someone who promotes our reliance on fracked gas. Below are two action alerts from Food & Water Watch and CREDO Action.  We encourage you to circulate one of these alerts, or create a petition of your own to put a stop to this disastrous decision!  

See Food & Water Watch's alert here.
See CREDO Action's alert here

Also, click to share this meme on your organization's Facebook page.

As this decision could be imminent, we are going to submit the letter below later today to President Obama to tell him that we need a climate leader in the Department of Energy - and Ernest Moniz is not that leader.  

Finally, we are a young coalition and we have a lot to figure out, but in the coming weeks, we will be sending out a survey to help determine how we can increase our impact and more fully involve all the organizations that make up Americans Against Fracking!  Stay tuned. 

Thanks for all you do!

David and the Americans Against Fracking Team 


Here is the Letter to President Obama:

Dear President Obama,

We are writing on behalf on Americans Against Fracking, a national coalition of over 190 national, state and local organizations, to oppose the rumored appointment of Dr. Ernest Moniz to the position of Secretary of Energy. While we appreciate your recent public comments about the need to address climate change, appointing Dr. Moniz, a proponent of hydraulic fracturing with close ties to the oil and gas industry, would be a major step backwards.

Fracking and drilling for gas and oil gas pose direct threats to our water, air, health, and climate. The risks and impacts on air and water have been well documented and are supported by extensive research (see attached partial list of citations). While effects on air and water are reason enough to reject fracking, research shows that drilling and fracking for natural gas contributes to climate change. The carbon dioxide emitted from burning natural gas contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions driving global climate change (Myhrvold and Caldeira, 2012). And, in addition to carbon dioxide, high-volume hydraulic fracturing releases significant amounts of methane into the atmosphere during the extraction, transport and processing of the gas.  Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, 33 times more efficient at trapping heat than carbon dioxide over 100 years, and about 100 times more potent than carbon dioxide over 20 years (Shindell et al. 2009).

As such, even small amounts of gas leaked into the atmosphere make enormous contributions to global warming. (Myhrvold and Caldeira, 2012). Increasing evidence, including a study led by researchers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, indicates that methane emissions from high volume hydraulic fracturing and related operations have been significantly underestimated by both the gas industry and the Environmental Protection Agency (Petron et al. 2012). The widespread use of natural gas is not a solution to climate change.

This is why your rumored appointment of Dr. Moniz is so disturbing. Moniz serves as director of MIT’s Energy Initiative, whose founding members include Shell, Saudi Aramco, ENI and BP Technology Ventures, Inc. The rest of the sustaining and associate members read as a who’s who of the oil and gas industry. Moniz views natural gas obtained by drilling and fracking as a key piece of our energy plan over the “next couple of decades.” In testimony before Congress in July 2011, he called “environmental risks, which arise from shale development” including “contamination of groundwater aquifers with drilling fluids or natural gas” “challenging but manageable.” He referred to natural gas as “a cost-effective bridge to…a low carbon future,” but we know based on research that natural gas is a bridge to nowhere.

Mr. President, we were heartened when you proclaimed your intention to act quickly to combat climate change in your 2013 inaugural address, stating that “we will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that failure to do so would betray our children and future generations.” Those words were inspiring, and last weekend 50,000 people came to Washington D.C., to support you in those efforts. But actions speak louder than words and appointing a strong proponent of extracting dirty fossil fuels as our nation’s energy secretary will lead us in the wrong direction.

The person you choose as Secretary of Energy will be key to charting how we address climate change. We desperately need to move away from dirty fossil fuels towards a clean energy future, and we need an energy secretary who has the vision and the independence to do this. Please select someone who will fill that vision and do not appoint Dr. Ernest Moniz.



   
Citations for documentation of risks and impacts to air and water:

Bamberger, Michelle and Robert E. Oswald. “Impacts of gas drilling on human and animal health.” New Solutions, Scientific Solutions, vol. 22, iss. 1. January 2012 at 51 to 77

Colborn, Theo et al. “Natural Gas Operations from a Public Health Perspective." International Journal of Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, vol. 17, iss. 5. September 2011 at 1041 and 1042

Entrekin, Sally et al. “Rapid expansion of natural gas development poses a threat to surface waters.” Frontiers in Ecology, vol. 9, iss. 9. October 2011 at 503

Finley, Bruce. “Drilling spills rise in Colorado, but fines rare.” The Denver Post. September 9, 2011.

Gilman, Jessica B. et al. “Source signature of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from oil and natural gas operations in northeastern Colorado.” Environmental Science & Technology. Accepted for publication January 14, 2013.

Kusnetz, Nicholas. “North Dakota’s oil boom brings damage along with prosperity.” ProPublica. June 7, 2012.

Lustgarten, Abrahm. “Buried Secrets: Is natural gas drilling endangering U.S. water supplies?” ProPublica. November 13, 2008.

McKenzie, Lisa M. et al. “Human health risk assessment of air emissions from development of unconventional natural gas resources.” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 424. May 2012 at 79 to 87

Myers, Tom. “Potential contaminant pathways from hydraulically fractured shale to aquifers.” Ground Water. April 17, 2012 at 3 to 4

Osborn, Stephen G. et al. “Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 108, iss. 20. May 17, 2011 at 8173 and 8175.